Your IQ

An ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves a conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another. These are not simple questions of right versus wrong, but situations where different ethical principles, values, and duties are in conflict. Navigating these dilemmas requires more than just gut feelings; it requires a structured way of thinking about morality. This guide will introduce you to the core concepts of ethical reasoning and two of the major philosophical frameworks that can help you analyze and make decisions about complex moral problems.

What Makes a Dilemma?

A true ethical dilemma is not a choice between a "right" action and a "wrong" one, but a choice between two or more "rights" or two or more "wrongs." For example, a doctor who must decide which of two equally needy patients gets a life-saving organ is facing an ethical dilemma. There is no perfectly "good" outcome.

Framework 1: Utilitarianism (Focus on Consequences)

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning it judges the morality of an action based on its outcomes or consequences. The core idea, most famously articulated by John Stuart Mill, is the "Greatest Happiness Principle."

The Principle: The most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

How to Apply It:

1. Identify all the possible courses of action.
2. For each action, predict the consequences for every person affected.
3. Assess the total amount of happiness or well-being (and unhappiness or harm) that each action would produce.
4. Choose the action that results in the best overall balance of happiness over harm.

Example Dilemma: A train is hurtling towards five people tied to the track. You can pull a lever to switch the train to another track, where there is only one person tied up. Do you pull the lever?

A Utilitarian Analysis: Pulling the lever results in one death, while not pulling it results in five deaths. From a purely utilitarian perspective, pulling the lever is the ethical choice because it minimizes the loss of life and thus maximizes well-being (or minimizes suffering).

Framework 2: Deontology (Focus on Duties and Rules)

Deontology, most famously associated with Immanuel Kant, is a non-consequentialist theory. It argues that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action.

Key Idea (The Categorical Imperative): Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. In simpler terms: Is this action something you would want everyone to do in all similar situations? For example, lying is wrong not just because it might lead to bad outcomes, but because if everyone lied, the very concept of trust would break down, making it a logically incoherent universal rule.

Example Dilemma (The Same Train Problem):

A Deontological Analysis: A deontologist might argue that pulling the lever is an act of intentionally causing someone's death. There is a moral rule against killing. Therefore, pulling the lever is wrong, regardless of the fact that it saves more lives. Not pulling the lever, while leading to a worse outcome, does not involve you actively participating in the act of killing. The five deaths happen as a result of the existing situation, not your direct action.

Making a Reasoned Choice

As you can see, these frameworks can lead to very different conclusions. There is often no single "correct" answer to an ethical dilemma. The goal of ethical reasoning puzzles is not to find the right answer, but to demonstrate your ability to think through the problem in a structured way. When faced with a dilemma, try to analyze it from both a utilitarian and a deontological perspective. Acknowledge the conflict between the two. This process of reasoned analysis, considering both consequences and duties, is the essence of mature moral thinking.